Dr. Lindsay Whitman conducts comprehensive neuropsychological assessments with children, adolescents, and young adults (ages 4-21). A neuropsychological evaluation is most helpful to parents who suspect that their child or teen may be struggling with a learning disability, developmental delay, intellectual disability, or is experiencing difficulty with memory, attention, or executive functioning skills (organization, planning). This type of comprehensive evaluation may also be helpful for children who may be struggling with behavioral, social or psychological difficulties (anxiety, depression) that seem to be interfering with cognitive and/or academic functioning. Neuropsychological evaluations may also be indicated for children or adolescents in whom the reason for difficulty is largely unclear.

In general, a neuropsychological evaluation is intended to help parents and teachers comprehensively understand why a child or teenager may be struggling to meet developmental, academic, or social milestones. The process often helps to pin down a clinical diagnosis but more importantly, identifies which kinds of interventional services would best support a child or teen to perform at their best in the classroom, at work, or in other learning or social settings. Dr. Whitman conducts all neuropsychological testing procedures herself, strives to generate reports that are streamlined and clearly written, and provides individualized feedback sessions upon completion of the report (within 2-3 weeks of last testing session).

Dr. Whitman also conducts private psychoeducational evaluations for children and adolescents who present primarily with academic difficulties. A psychoeducational evaluation is shorter in length than a neuropsychological evaluation and is suitable for the diagnosis of specific learning disabilities only (e.g., dyslexia/reading disorder, mathematics disorder, learning disability not otherwise specified). A psychoeducational evaluation is similar to what is frequently offered through a child’s school.

Dr. Whitman’s clinical training includes the evaluation of children, teens, and adults with a variety of cognitive and learning risk factors including developmental delay, intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorder, learning disabilities, (e.g. dyslexia), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), traumatic brain injury, and psychiatric/mood difficulties. Her postdoctoral fellowship at New York University Comprehensive Epilepsy Center included specialized training in the cognitive assessment and pre-surgical evaluation of individuals with seizures/epilepsy. Dr. Whitman has presented empirical research at national and international neuropsychology conferences and has published peer-reviewed articles on issues related to cognitive functioning in individuals with epilepsy and aspects of adolescent personality development. Whitman Research

Dr. Whitman is a licensed clinical psychologist in the state of New York. She completed a Ph.D. in clinical psychology/neuropsychology at Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science/The Chicago Medical School. She completed clinical internship at West Virginia University School of Medicine and a two-year postdoctoral fellowship in clinical neuropsychology at New York University Comprehensive Epilepsy Center. Dr. Whitman also holds a masters degree in early childhood risk and development from Harvard Graduate School of Education and a bachelor’s degree in nutritional sciences from Cornell University.

Dr. Whitman has met the education and training requirements for practice certification by the American Board of Clinical Neuropsychology (ABCN). ABCN certification is a voluntary process for neuropsychologists designed to ensure competent neuropsychological assessment via intensive peer review of practice knowledge and clinical skill level. The process is much like board certification in medicine and is designed to provide external validation of thorough competence in a specialty area. Dr. Whitman is currently in the process of completing the process of obtaining full board certification in clinical neuropsychology through the American Board of Professional Psychology.

Dr. Whitman offers free 30-minute consultation periods by phone or e-mail exchange. Consultation is often useful in determining whether your child may benefit most from a neuropsychological or psychoeducational evaluation.

Email: lindsaywhitmanphd@gmail.com | Call: 347-560-1399

Dr. Whitman accepts private pay only. There are different fee scales for neuropsychological and psychoeducational evaluations. Cash, check, or credit card accepted.

Dr. Whitman works with you to determine if an office or home-based evaluation is best for your child. If office-based work is preferred, the evaluation will be completed in Dr. Whitman’s office at One Grand Central Place, 305 Madison Avenue in Manhattan. If a home-based evaluation is appropriate, Dr. Whitman will evaluate your child directly in your Brooklyn or Manhattan home.

I field many questions from parents who are concerned with their child’s ability to read. Indeed, there are many confusing pieces of information on the internet that have the potential to mislead parents or teachers in understanding the reasons why one should (or should not) be concerned with a child or adolescent’s reading skill development. Other parents ask me to describe the ways that a neuropsychological or psychoeducational evaluation may help their child if indeed a reading difficulty is identified. This piece is intended to define dyslexia and discuss the process and value of a comprehensive evaluation process.

Dyslexia is another term for Reading Disorder, which is the technical term for reading difficulties used in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-IV-TR (“DSM”: the manual used by psychologists and social workers which lists and describes all possible diagnoses). In order to meet DSM-IV-TR criteria for reading disorder/dyslexia, a child’s reading skills must be substantially below what would be expected given her/his age, intelligence level, and education (as noted below, this objective “discrepancy” is NOT the only nor the most important criterion to consider). In addition, the child’s reading difficulty must interfere to a noticeable degree with both his/her academic performance and any general life skills that require reading proficiency. Finally, if the child has a sensory problem (e.g., vision difficulty), his/her reading difficulties must be over and above what would be expected based on the sensory difficulty alone.

There are two types of dyslexia: developmental dyslexia (e.g., an individual is born with difficulties) and acquired dyslexia (e.g., an individual ‘acquires’ reading difficulties secondary to a sudden occurrence such as a neurological injury). Developmental dyslexia is common among individuals with first-degree relatives with learning disorders. Thus, although dyslexia appears to be highly heritable, a child’s environment (e.g., how much the child’s parents encourage or model reading behaviors, how many books or reading materials are in the home) also seems to play an important role in the development of different types of reading profiles (Haiyou-Thomas, 2008).

Recent research shows that there are clear functional differences in the “brain systems” of children and young adults diagnosed with developmental dyslexia (Richlan, Kronbichler, & Wimmer, 2011). Research has also demonstrated that the functionality of disrupted “brain systems” has the potential to change upon exposure to high quality reading remediation (Shaywitz, Lyon, & Shaywitz, 2006). In other words, research suggests that with proper and timely reading intervention, the brains of children with dyslexia can change to function more similarly to the brains of children without dyslexia. This suggests that it is very important to identify early vulnerabilities to reading difficulties in children so that high quality programming may be initiated as soon as possible. In general, a younger child’s brain is more “plastic” or malleable than an older child’s brain, and thus, there is greater potential for more efficient change in younger children. (Identification of reading vulnerabilities before age six or seven is ideal.)

If I am concerned about my child, what kind of evaluation should a neuropsychologist do to evaluate whether or not my child meets the criteria for dyslexia?

When a child is referred for a neuropsychological or psychoeducational evaluation, there are often additional concerns (e.g., attention/concentration, mathematics skills, handwriting, impulsivity/behavior, mood, social skills) cited in addition to reading. For this reason, an evaluation should always be always tailored to the individual child. However, there are three parts of any evaluation in whom a reading disorder/dyslexia is diagnosed that are indispensable.

1. Standard scores on decoding and/or reading comprehension tests must be substantially lower than other children who are at her/his age and/or education level in order to diagnose dyslexia. It is important that children being compared have been exposed to the same level of education (e.g., if a child was very sick for a period of years and missed a substantial amount of school, it may not be entirely appropriate to directly compare her/him to his same-aged peer group).

2. In order to diagnose dyslexia, there must be substantial evidence (via history, clinical observation, and patterns of scores on a wide variety of tests) that establishes the extent to which the reading difficulty may be considered unexpected for this child (e.g., the child is very verbal, has a good vocabulary, and demonstrates otherwise strong academic or thinking or language skills).

3. Although recent research indicates that there may be different subtypes of dyslexia which include or do not include phonologic weakness (O’Brien, Wolf, & Lovett, 2011), the traditional understanding of dyslexia includes this clinical feature (e.g., clear and consistent difficulty linking sounds to letters). Thus, a thorough evaluation of dyslexia must thoroughly investigate the presence/absence of this quality in a child’s reading skill set via standardized tests of decoding. Other aspects of a child’s developing reading skills such as oral reading fluency, spelling skills, and reading comprehension are also central to an evaluation of dyslexia.

It is common for schools to rely heavily on the essence of criteria one or a “discrepancy model” (i.e., a 15-standard score point gap between a child’s intelligence level and reading level) to identify reading difficulties in children. This is concerning not only because there are important variations among testing materials between schools, but also because this approach does not necessarily capture the presence or absence of the “phonologic” component of dyslexia. Elimination of this component of an evaluation compromises accurate identification of children with these difficulties and the provision of a clear description of specific learning needs (e.g., type of intervention program, intensity of intervention format), leading to the possibility that a child will be matched with a reading program does not address his/her needs. Pairing a child with the wrong type of services may lead to what seems to be a lack of success when the true reason for difficulty is that his/her needs are not being appropriately supported.

So, in summary, why is a truly comprehensive neuropsychological/psychoeducational evaluation process important if I am concerned about my child?

As noted above, it is very important to identify a reading difficulty as early as possible in a child; the earlier a child is provided with the proper type of supportive services, the higher the chances of rapid progress with remediation. In addition, there are many classroom/school accommodations that can and should be provided to children with reading difficulties that will support them academically and hopefully reduce undue anxiety or stress. Examples of accommodations for children with dyslexia may include (depending on the child, of course) extended time for classwork and standardized tests, a quiet space to complete work, the provision of audiobooks or note taking services, and the use of visually-based learning aides. In sum, a neuropsychological evaluation will not only identify the needs of your child on a very comprehensive (and thereby likely more accurate) level, but also provide a thorough and practical list of the direct (e.g., classroom) or equally important indirect (e.g., therapeutic support to bolster self esteem or reduce anxiety) recommended services to best support him or her through their learning process.

If you have concerns about your child or questions about whether a neuropsychological or psychoeducational evaluation may be indicated for a child, do not hesitate to contact me at 347-560-1399 for a free 30 minute consultation session. Feel free to also e-mail me at lindsaywhitmanphd@gmail.com.

REFERENCES:
Hayiou-Thomas, M.E. (2008). Genetic and environmental influences on early speech, language, and literacy development. Journal of Communication Disorders, 41(5), 397-408.

O’Brien, B., Wolf, M., & Lovett, M. (2011). A Taxometric Investigation of Dyslexia Subtypes. Dyslexia, 18 (1), 16-39.

Richlan, F., Kronbichler, M., & Wimmer, H. (2011). Meta-analyzing brain dysfunctions of children with dyslexia. Neuroimage, 56 (3), 1735-1742.

Shaywitz, B.A., Lyon, G.R., & Shaywitz, S.E. (2006). The role of magnetic resonance imaging in understanding reading and dyslexia. Developmental Neuropsychology, 30 (1), 613-632.